I’m speaking about the most common scenario where you have a central authentication system and all parties pass user token\ticket to operate on behalf of the user.
This introduces the next topic, what are all the HCMS limitations? Limitations of HCMS Otherwise trying to put it into HMS you will discover that most cloud solution\products are not so flexible. Where to implement? If you want to do not implement into HCMS you have to put it into the presentation layer and with multiple consumers you will duplicate it, falling in problems you have when logic is in more than one place. This is good for decoupling, but in all cases, you have only one consumer decoupling advantages is not so relevant and you introduce more complexity and latency over the data fetch process. Moreover, as the HCMS doesn’t have any rendering all presentation logic is demanded to the client. HCMS requires to employ multiple teams to benefits from work parallelization. Capabilities may vary a lot based on the specific product and if it is an on-prem or saas solution.Īctually, there is mainly two kinds of CMS headless limitation: In this paragraph, I would share my experience with the limitations I found.
HCMS are quite young compared to traditional CMS so, even if a lot of product borns in last years, most of the products are not so mature to completely replace a traditional API backend.
Dato headless cms free#
This means you can be free to technology constraints.
Dato headless cms for free#
Moreover, compared to a custom solution, update and bug fixes came for free from the vendor. Low operating costs: Headless CMSs are a product so, once you choose a good one, I expect it will be plug-and-play.If you store some news content on it you can publish on public web site or intranet as well, keeping data entry in one place. Omnichannel readiness: The content created in a headless CMS is “pure” and you can consume in every context you want.Why use a headless CMS? I could simply say that in some scenarios it can be useful to decouple systems, make easier frontend replacement and speed up the development phase, but I feel obliged to explain better using a bullet list.
In my point of view, I’m strictly related to the original integralist definition: headless cms means an API first, non-monolithic CMS, completely decoupled from the interface or other components. Many vendors sell their product and label it at “HCMS” just because it is decoupled (and because it sounds cool and may drive to a sell improvement.). HCMS born to create a multi-component application where you can quickly change presentation logic and design, and this is a big improvement when you are working on modern websites or application and you need to restyle\change UI once at a year because of business requirement. Going in this direction HCMS is something that can replace what you are calling backend and save a lot of useful work creating CRUD statements. The purpose of HCMS is to decouple logic from content making easy change management and decomposing complex application in many components, each one with his single responsibility. This may seem a limitation because barely speaking you lose something. Photo by Sincerely Media on Unsplash What is a Headless CMS?Ī traditional CMS combines content and rendering part, meanwhile, a headless CMS is focused only on the content.